Peer Review Process
The editorial Process
A manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to Journal Excellent World of Midwifery alone at that point in time and has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere. The journal expects that authors would authorize one of them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged. On submission, editors review all submitted manuscripts initially for suitability for formal review. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are rejected before proceeding for formal peer-review. Manuscripts that are unlikely to be of interest to Journal Excellent World of Midwifery readers are also liable to be rejected at this stage itself. Editors first review the submitted manuscript, called initial review by the editors. It will be desk evaluated whether the submitted manuscript is suitable for the Excellent World of Midwifery based on focus and scope, similarity score by using Turnitine, methodological flaw, readability of the articles, and adhering to the submitted paper template. Review process article using Double Blind Peer Review, the manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers. The reviewers should not be affiliated with the same institutes as the contributor/s. However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion of the editor. The editor in chief makes the final decision on the manuscript.
The comments and suggestions (acceptance/ rejection/ amendments in manuscript) received from reviewers are conveyed to the corresponding author. If required, the author is requested to provide a point by point response to reviewers comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript. This process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding author.
The corresponding author is expected to return the corrected proofs within three days. It may not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process of submission of the manuscript to final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed online. To achieve faster and greater dissemination of knowledge and information, the journal publishes articles online as Ahead of Print immediately on acceptance.
Reject - Rejected manuscripts will not be published, and authors will not have the opportunity to resubmit a revised version of the manuscript to Jurnal Citizenship.
Resubmit for Review The submission needs to be re-worked, but with significant changes, it may be accepted. However, It will require a second round of review.
Accept with Revisions - Manuscripts receiving an accept-pending-revisions decision will be published in Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery under the condition that Minor or Major modifications are made. Revisions will be reviewed by an editorial team to ensure necessary updates are made prior to publication.
Accept - Accepted manuscripts will be published in the current form, with no further modifications required.
Correspondence
All correspondence concerning manuscripts should be directed to the Editor of Journal Excellent World of Midwifery and cc to excellentfomidwiferyjournal@gmail.com. The Editor will direct all correspondence to the lead author; the lead author is responsible for sharing communications with other authors. Beyond communication concerning the review, manuscripts accepted for publication may require additional correspondence to complete copyediting and layout editing.




